1. Leveno K, Bloom S, Casey B. William Obstetrics 26th. Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill Professional; 2022.
3. Maharaj D. Assessing cephalopelvic disproportion: back to the basics. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey. 2010;65(6):387-395. doi:10.1097/ogx.0b013e3181ecdf0c
4. American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics. ACOG Practice Bulletin Number 49, December 2003: Dystocia and augmentation of labor. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 102: 1445-54.
7. Drennan K, Blackwell S, Sokol RJ. Abnormal labor: diagnosis and management. Glob Libr Women's Med. (ISSN: 1756-2228) 2008. DOI 10.3843/GLOWM.10132.
13. Sporri S, Thoeny HC, Raio L, Lachat R, Vock P, Schneider H. MR Imaging Pelvimetry: A useful adjunct in the treatment of women at risk for dystocia? American Journal of Roentgenology. 2002;179:137-144. 10.2214/ajr.179.1.1790137.
17. Nicholson JM, Kellar LC. The active management of impending cephalopelvic disproportion in nulliparous women at term: a case series. Journal of Pregnancy. 2010;2010:708615. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/708615
19. Gleason RL, Yigeremu M, Debebe T, Teklu S, Zewdeneh D, et al. A safe, low-cost, easy-to-use 3D camera platform to assess risk of obstructed labor due to cephalopelvic disproportion. PLOS ONE. 2018;13(9):e0203865. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0203865
20. Franz M, von Bismarck A, Delius M, Ertl-Wagner B, Deppe C, Mahner S, et al. MR pelvimetry: prognosis for successful vaginal delivery in patients with suspected fetopelvic disproportion or breech presentation at term. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017;295(2):351-359. DOI 10.1007/s00404-016-4276-6
21. Kakoma JB. Cesarean section indication and anthropometric parameters in Rwandan nulliparae: preliminary results from longitudinal survey. Pan Afr Med J. 2016;24:310. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2016.24.310.9603
22. Kordi M, Alijahan R. The diagnostic accuracy of external pelvimetry to predict dystocia in nulliparous women. Zahedan J Res Med Sci. 2012;14(56):36-38.
23. World Health Organization (WHO). WHO recommendations Intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience. WHO, 2018. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/272447/WHO-RHR-18.12-eng.pdf
24. Kemenkes RI-WHO. Buku Saku Pelayanan Kesehatan Ibu di Fasilitas Kesehatan Dasar dan Rujukan. Jakarta; 2013.
25. Munabi IG, Luboga SA, Luboobi L, Mirembe F. Association between maternal pelvis height and intrapartum foetal head moulding in Ugandan mothers with spontaneous vertex deliveries. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2016;201 doi: 10.1155/2016/3815295
26. Srisukho S, Tongsong T, Srisupundit K. Adherence to guidelines on the diagnosis of cephalopelvic disproportion at Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital. J Med Assoc Thail. 2014;97(10):999-1003.
27. Ansari A, Akhtar S, Aamir M. Causes and management of high fetal head in primigravida at term. Pak Armed Forces Med J. 2008;58(1):16-20. https://pafmj.org/index.php/PAFMJ/article/view/1697/1454
28. Adisso S, Atrevy N, Adisso EL, Mukanire, Perrin RX, Alihonou E. X-ray pelvimetry: prognosis of delivery by cephalous-pelvic confrontation in Cotonou. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2017;6(9):3737-3741. http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20174017
29. Korhonen U, Taipale P, Heinonen S. Assessment of bony pelvis and vaginally assisted deliveries. ISRN Obstet Gynecol. 2013;2013:764782. doi: 10.1155/2013/763782
34. S. Srisukho, K. Srisupundit, T. Tongsong. Fulfillment of the criteria for diagnosis of cephalo-pelvic disproportion: ACOG guidelines. Clin. Exp. Obstet. Gynecol. 2020, 47(4), 500–504. https://doi.org/10.31083/j.ceog.2020.04.5272